16 Photos That Look Like They Were Taken on a Different Planet

By: Themindcircle
Via Themindcircle

The Three Sisters, dormant volcanoes in Oregon, USA

amazing-interesting-places-1-arttextum-replicacion.jpg

Photo: Nagesh Mahadev

Fly Geyser, Nevada, USA

amazing-interesting-places-2-arttextum-replicacion.jpg

Photo: Inge Johnsson

Lake Baikal, Siberia, Russia

amazing-interesting-places-3-arttextum-replicacion.jpg

Photo: Alexey Trofimov

The Wave canyon, Arizona, USA

amazing-interesting-places-4-arttextum-replicacion.jpg

Photo: Simon J. Byrne

Antarctica

amazing-interesting-places-5-arttextum-replicacion.jpg

Photo: Martin Bailey

A beach in the Alentejo, Portugal

amazing-interesting-places-6-arttextum-replicacion.jpg

Photo: Jose Carvalho

Abraham Lake, Alberta, Canada

amazing-interesting-places-7-arttextum-replicacion.jpg

Photo: Emmanuel Coupe Kalomiris

Rainbow mountains in Zhangye Danxia National Geological Park, China

amazing-interesting-places-8-arttextum-replicacion.jpg

Photo: Process Sensors

An ice-covered cave in Wisconsin, USA

amazing-interesting-places-9-arttextum-replicacion.jpg

Photo: Brian Peterson

Desert in northern Arizona, USA

amazing-interesting-places-10-arttextum-replicacion.jpg

Photo: Sean Bagshaw

Desert in Namibia

amazing-interesting-places-11-arttextum-replicacion.jpg

Photo: Martin Bailey

The pink-coloured Lake Hillier, Australia

amazing-interesting-places-12-arttextum-replicacion.jpg

Photo: Vusal Alekberov

The Goðafoss waterfall, Iceland

amazing-interesting-places-13-arttextum-replicacion.jpg

Photo: Iurie Belegurschi

Dallol volcano, Ethopia

amazing-interesting-places-14-arttextum-replicacion.jpg

Photo: sometimesinteresting

Socotra archipelago, Yemen

amazing-interesting-places-15-arttextum-replicacion.jpg

Photo: thesuiteworld

Leitisvatn/Sørvágsvatn, the Faroe Islands

amazing-interesting-places-16-arttextum-replicacion.jpg

Photo: reddit

We believe in your work, that's why we share it with original links; if you disagree, please contact us.


Related Arttextum Artists:

Marcela Rico, artista Arttextum
Marcela Rico
Gianine Tabja, artista Arttextum
Gianine Tabja
Alejandro Jaime, artista Arttextum
Alejandro Jaime

Los cenotes de México, agua dadora de vida

Autor: Agencia Informativa Conacyt
Vía Conacyt | Diciembre 15, 2017

 

Mérida, Yucatán. 15 de diciembre de 2017 (Agencia Informativa Conacyt).- Para la civilización maya los cenotes eran lugar de nacimiento de la vida, ventanas al inframundo y contenedores de aguas sagradas. Y en realidad, al ser el único punto de acceso al acuífero subterráneo, los cenotes de la Península de Yucatán dan vida a animales, plantas y humanos.

A falta de ríos y lagos, la vida en la península se sostiene gracias al acuífero subterráneo que se ha formado por la infiltración del agua de lluvia a través del suelo poroso y fracturado que caracteriza a la región. Pero la porosidad que da orígen al acuífero también lo vuelve susceptible a la contaminación, pues no solo la lluvia, también los contaminantes pueden infiltrase hasta alcanzar el agua contenida en el subsuelo. Una vez allí los contaminantes pueden almacenarse o distribuirse y extender el problema de contaminación.

El acuífero subterráneo es la principal fuente de agua dulce para los asentamientos humanos de la península, incluso para las ciudades de Mérida, Cancún y Playa del Carmen.

Agua-cenote-arttextum-replicacion

Al ser los únicos cuerpos de agua en el norte de la península, los cenotes son vitales para la diversidad biológica. Proveen de agua y son hábitat de insectos, reptiles, mamíferos, aves, peces y plantas.

Lirio-arttextum-replicacion.jpg

Cuando cae, el agua de lluvia se vuelve ligeramente ácida al absorber dióxido de carbono de la atmósfera (CO2). Al llegar a la tierra, el agua ácida disuelve la piedra que forma el subsuelo península y la vuelve más porosa.

El agua de lluvia sigue disolviendo la roca caliza formando grietas y fracturas que se ensanchan hasta formar cuevas. Con el paso del tiempo el techo de las cuevas puede colapsar y dejar al descubierto el manto acuífero. En ese momento se ha formado un cenote.

cenote-arttextum-replicacion2.jpg

 

Al filtrarse por el subsuelo y llegar a una cavidad aérea, el CO2 disuelto en el agua se convierte de nuevo en gas y el agua pierde su capacidad de disolver minerales. Esto ocasiona que los minerales se depositen formando estalactitas, estalagmitas y columnas.

El proceso de disolución de la piedra caliza ha sucedido en Yucatán desde hace unos 60 ó 70 millones de años. Esta es la razón de el paisaje tan característico de la región. A este paisaje se le denomina paisaje kárstico.

paisaje-karstico-arttectum-replicacion

Cenotes y humanos:

Los cenotes están cargados de un significado histórico y han sido objeto de veneración para las comunidades mayas.

En la península, la población maya prehispánica dependían casi en su totalidad del agua del acuíferos subterráneo, a la cual accedía gracias a los cenotes, las grutas-cenote y los pozos. Además recolectaban el agua de lluvia en chultunes, depósitos parecidos a aljibes que se construían en la roca caliza.

inframundo-yaxbacaltun-arttextum-replicacion.jpg

En el siglo XVI la política colonial tenía como prioridad establecer las poblaciones humanas donde el abasto de agua estuviera garantizado. Por esta razón las comunidades de la época estaban asociadas a uno o varios cenotes.

En el siglo XIX, en el auge de la industria henequenera, el agua del acuífero subterráneo era utilizada para abastecer las haciendas.

En la actualidad los cenotes se han convertido en un bien turístico. Aunque en algunas comunidades siguen siendo la principal fuente de agua dulce y mantienen su importancia espiritual.

pozo-cenote-arttextum-replicacion.jpg

Contaminación

La porosidad y las grietas en el subsuelo vuelven al acuífero subterráneo muy susceptible a la contaminación. Pues las aguas residuales, los plaguicidas, fertilizantes, aceites de motor y otros líquidos pueden percolar hasta el agua subterránea.

En la península no existe un sistema de drenaje público, la mayoría del agua de desecho termina en en sumideros que van directamente al acuífero o a fosas sépticas que no proveen un tratamiento suficiente. Para el 2014, solo el 2.4 por ciento de las aguas residuales provenientes de los hogares de Yucatán recibían tratamiento.

basura-arttextum-replicacion.jpg

Fotos e imagen de portada: Amapola Nava

 

Creemos en tu trabajo y opinión, por eso lo difundimos con créditos; si no estás de acuerdo, por favor contáctanos.


Artists de Arttextum relacionados:

Gilberto Esparza, artista Arttextum
Gilberto Esparza
Marcela Rico, artista Arttextum
Marcela Rico

 

William Eggleston: Who’s Afraid of Magenta, Yellow and Cyan?

William Eggleston: Who’s Afraid of Magenta, Yellow and Cyan?

By: The ASX Team
Via ASX| July 1, 2015

Article recommended by Angélica Escoto from Mexico, collaborator of Arttextum’s Replicación

Eggleston’s wife Rosa remembers being awestruck when she saw his first slides beam out of their home projector, a quintessential “amateur” moment after the road trip, a travelogue (or, alternatively, how one might vet images for a fashion shoot before printing them for publication). “It was so saturated and so intense,” she said. “It was astounding to see color like that.”

By Anna Kerrer Kivlan, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2007 – The first part in a multi-part text on Eggleston.

Eggleston brought MoMA around eight carousels of slides made around 1970 from which Szarkowski chose seventy-five for the exhibition and, of those, forty-eight for publication in the Guide.

Despite their ostensive similarity to the amateur snapshot, noted disparagingly by Thornton and Kramer, the pictures were not made with the Kodak lnstamatic or Polaroid one might have taken on a family vacation, but rather with a Leica. That small camera carried with it a mystique, for it signaled a commitment to photography as art, and had been used by the most highly regarded black and white photographers Robert Frank, Walker Evans, Garry Winogrand, Lee Friedlander, Diane Arbus, and Eggleston’s role-model, Henri Cartier-Bresson. The fact that the Guide was the result of work done with a high-art Leica is significant, for during the time leading up to Eggleston’s exhibition, color photography had been denigrated as emphatically not art. It was badmouthed by photographers such as Evans (enshrined for his photographs of the Great Depression), who wrote in the late 1969 book of essays edited by Louis Kronenberger, Quality: Its Image in the Arts, “There are four simple words for the matter, which must be whispered: color photography is vulgar.” By this logic, Evans concluded that color film was an ideal medium for the rendering of subjects that were likewise vulgar.

When the point of a picture subject is precisely its vulgarity or its color-accident through man’s hands not God’s, then only can color film be used validly…. Almost always, color can be used well only by a photographer who is an artist of perfect taste-Marie Cosindas for example-and of immense technical mastery; for color has to be controlled and altered from start to finish by selection of film, by lens filters, and in developing and printing.”

Frank, who had been lauded for his searing 1959 documentary series, The Americans, was known to have concluded simply that “black and white are the colors of photography.” As with Evans, Frank’s opinion was not to be taken lightly; in Szarkowski’s esteemed view, the Swiss photographer’s The Americans series was one of the works that established the main thrust of photography in the fifties, along with the 1952 founding of the photography journal Aperture by Minor White.

Color film had been on the market since the 1930s-as early as 1948, articles in The New York Times covered amateur exhibitions featuring multiple-toned color prints while new developers were offered that aimed to improve detail in color prints, through the Kodak Dye Transfer process. It is therefore telling that color photography did not come of age as an art form until the late 1960s.16 MoMA’s very first exhibition of color photographs was in 1962, featuring work by Ernest Haas.17 While Haas’s work, according to Szarkowski, was “handsome and even inventive,” it fell short of Eggleston’s later accomplishment because it was “dedicated to a basically familiar idea of beauty, one very indebted to painterly traditions.”18 MoMA’s next attempt at mastering the art of photographic color was a 1966 exhibition of the still life portfolio of Marie Cosindas. Invitations were mailed to thousands of Polaroid stockholders in Connecticut, New Jersey, and New York on thick card stock with a glossy Cosindas Polaroid of flowers in a vase pasted on the front.19

william-eggleston-arttextum-replicacion.jpg

Eggleston’s hobby was to watch thousands of rows of amateur snapshots being developed at the local photography lab.

According to a MoMA press release, the exhibition was the museum’s first to be devoted entirely to prints made by the Polaroid Land Process.20 The 4 x 5 prints “specially matted and mounted on color papers chosen by Miss Cosindas” were described as having “exotic color and startling detail.” To Szarkowski, the photographs-“as real and as unlikely as butterflies”- inhabited, as for him artistic photographs must, a timeless realm. Indeed, the images possessed an “otherworldliness” that referred to a “place and time not quite identifiable-a place with the morning-fresh textures and the opalescent light of a private Arcady, and to a time suspended, as in a child’s long holiday.”21 Ten years later, in the introductory essay to William Eggleston’s Guide, Szarkowski cited Cosindas’s work alongside Irving Penn’s as the few “conspicuous successes of color photography.” Yet neither Cosindas nor Penn had resolved the issue of color within the tradition of so-called “straight,” uncontrived photography. Their achievement had thus been less than Eggleston’s, having amounted only to “masterly studio constructions, designed to suit the preferences of the camera” and dependent on a “high degree of prior control over the material photographed.22

Critical and media response to the Haas and Cosindas exhibitions, and to Helen Levitt’s 1974 show of color slides as part of MoMA’s “Looking at Photographs: 100 Pictures from the Collection of the Museum of Modern Art,” was meager in comparison to the coverage of Eggleston’s show two years later. In a short blurb about Levitt’s forty color slides of New York street life taken after 1971, The Village Voice took note of the color issue only by observing with disinterest: “Purists may feel that great documentary photos still come only in black and white.” Park East’s brief mention of the slide exhibition, which was “shown in continuous projection describing New York street life,” makes no mention whatsoever about color.23 Color film was, at the time, inseparably associated with magazines such as Life and Vogue, with television, Super 8 home movie cameras, and Technicolor movies. Color film was not the medium of the fine artist. It was better suited the director of raunchy, sex-and-violence-crazed double features shown at the local movie theater. How could the same medium exuberantly producing trash cinema be called upon to make something worthy of MoMA’s walls? Never before had such an inherently uncouth medium been smuggled into the rarefied world of high art. There was no mistaking it: color film was a wildcard for the art world.

Despite the less than honorable reputation of color, Eggleston’s wife Rosa remembers being awestruck when she saw his first slides beam out of their home projector, a quintessential “amateur” moment after the road trip, a travelogue (or, alternatively, how one might vet images for a fashion shoot before printing them for publication). “It was so saturated and so intense,” she said. “It was astounding to see color like that.”24 Around that time, Eggleston’s hobby was to watch thousands of rows of amateur snapshots being developed at the local photography lab. He remarked in a 1993 interview for History of Photography.

On a typical evening, maybe we might see twelve pictures on a ribbon a few inches wide, a continuous roll of paper. Maybe at one minute we might see twelve or fifteen pictures that two people made on their first trip after having been married, and they forgot to have them developed. And years later they sent them over and here I was looking at them… it was one of the most exciting and unforgettable experiences as a whole-and educational for me.25

Asked in a recent phone conversation how viewing amateur photographs in a lab could influence the making of artistic photography, Eggleston spoke with emotion, placing the amateur photographs he had viewed somewhere in an idyllic past, which, coupled with their small size and grainy look, heightened their exquisiteness to him:

I had a close friend who worked there, not an artist, he managed a certain color lab, produced endless amounts of people’s snapshots, loved to see them come off the machine. He gave me a great many ideas. But this fellow was not an artist at all. He just managed this lab… they would develop a lot of rolls that people had taken many years back, on a honeymoon and were so beautiful, almost kind of grainy, but the prints were beautiful-little tiny small prints. I would enjoy spending time with him, I still love him. I would drop in and watch what was coming out.26

arttextum-replicacion-custom.jpg

 

But Eggleston showed neither slides nor strips of commercially developed snapshots when it came time to produce the MoMA exhibition.7 Eggleston’s use of the dye transfer process, increasing the preciousness of the photographs as artistic objects, differentiated them from the typical snapshot they sometimes closely resembled.

The expense and time taken by the process limited the number of photographs reproduced. So tedious was the process that Kodak stopped making the materials used for dye transfer in the early 1990s.28  Dye transfer, Kodak’s proprietary process, renders the richest tones in color photography and was the most expensive printing process Eggleston could have chosen at the time. Each print cost him several hundred dollars and the multiple-step process took (and still takes) a minimum of three days per print. The printing press uses four separate printing plates, one each for the three primary colors (magenta, yellow, and cyan) and one for black. Each plate is engraved with a halftone image for one of the colors, which is coated with a thin layer of oil-based ink. The four plates then transfer their ink onto the surface of a sheet of blank paper to make the color pictures. The final picture is not created chemically on the paper, but rather assembled on the paper’s surface from four separate screened color images. Such challenges meant that, while Eggleston had been a proficient black and white printer, he stopped printing himself after he began shooting in color. Only a dedicated specialist could do the job. The expense, level of skill, and rarity of the dye transfer process rendered Eggleston’s images unattainable for the average person with a Polaroid camera. Thus, despite their apparent similarity to the snapshot (and the critical reaction such a similarity fueled), they were “art” indeed.29

Dye transfer was a process largely used in fashion photography, and Eggleston’s first printer in New York, Don Gottlinger, had worked primarily for the fashion industry.3 Fashion, however, is only rarely and anxiously art, no matter how many models stood in front of Jackson Pollock’s 1950 Autumn Rhythm.31 So while the battle to make photography an art form “had been fought and won” in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries by black and white photographers, most serious photographers in the late 1960s and early ’70s still believed that the formal problems of color-the exaggeration of hue and the difficulty of organizing color combinations-coupled with its ties to advertising and the commercially-developed casual snapshot rendered it coarse and difficult to work with.32

 

arttextum-replicacion-asx2.png

arttextum-replicacion-asx

We believe in your work, that's why we share it with original links; if you disagree, please contact us.


Related Arttextum Artists:

Marcela Rico, artista Arttextum
Marcela Rico
Karina Villalobos, artista Arttextum
Karina Villalobos
Tatewaki Nio, artista Arttextum
Tatewaki Nio

Bendita agua, bendito cielo, ¡bendita vida!

Bendita agua, bendito cielo, ¡bendita vida!

Autora: Mónica Fallas
Vía Instagram @agencia_fotográfica_ | Noviembre 2016

Imagen recomendada por Cindy Elizondo, colaboradora de Costa Rica para Replicación de Arttextum

Nuestra colaboradora Cindy Elizondo nos ha compartido esta fotografía de su natal Costa Rica. Sigue a la autora en Instagram (@agencia_fotográfica_) y descubre más.

Creemos en tu trabajo y opinión, por eso lo difundimos con créditos; si no estás de acuerdo, por favor contáctanos.


Artistas de Arttextum relacionados:

Rossana Martinez, artista Arttextum
Rossana Martínez
Marcela Rico, artista Arttextum
Marcela Rico
Karina Juárez, artista Arttextum
Karina Juárez

Playa Avellanas, Costa Rica

Playa Avellanas, Costa Rica

Autor: José Daniel Peraza
Vía Instagram | January 24, 2017

Artículo recomendado por Cindy Elizondo, colaboradora de Costa Rica para Replicación de Arttextum

 

Nuestra colaboradora Cindy Elizondo nos ha compartido esta fotografía de su natal Costa Rica. Sigue al autor en Instagram (@jdpc03) y descubre más.

Creemos en tu trabajo y opinión, por eso lo difundimos con créditos; si no estás de acuerdo, por favor contáctanos.


Artistas de Arttextum relacionados:

Karina Juárez, artista Arttextum
Karina Juárez
Marcela Rico, artista Arttextum
Marcela Rico
Tatewaki Nio, artista Arttextum
Tatewaki Nio